|
|
Post by casper on Oct 21, 2012 22:49:54 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Allu on Oct 22, 2012 12:50:03 GMT -5
Aalrightey then  |
|
|
|
Post by chicago on Oct 22, 2012 13:42:03 GMT -5
Too much switching/disassembly/reassembly/carry too many parts to the field for my taste.
I was honestly surprised how complicated that was. Took quite a while. Now SAR12 lovers will crucify me; but I'd get half way through all that and one of two things is going to happen:
- I'm getting bunkered
or
- I forgot what I was doing and on top of all that my gun is like half disassembled (may be I was cleaning it!)
Glad I got a simple to shoot SR1. That looks 12 times more difficult A!
|
|
|
|
Post by pcbean on Oct 24, 2012 14:25:52 GMT -5
I got my SAR on Monday, it's very simple to change over.
I don't think anyone would try and do it on the field, it's really meant so you have the option of going one way or the other...
I've had a chance to shoot a few SR-1s, Delta here in New Jersey has 3 of them and another guy from a team at my local field has 1.
Nice guns, I like them a lot. I still like the option of having a magazine, being able to run multiple configurations is nice.
The design aspects I actually like on the SAR, are the stock placement and how low the picatinny rail is. It makes 50+ yard First Strike shots possible using only the scope without an adjustable riser, and I bet I could get further out with an actual good optic that had more elevation adjustment.
Now as for the SR-1, for the more experienced user, it seems awesome, especially how it's a lego gun for those that really know how they want there setups.
|
|
